An angry Juror 3 accuses Juror 5, who grew up in a slum, of changing his vote out of sympathy towards slum children. Sidney Lumetwhose prior directorial credits included dramas for television productions such as The Alcoa Hour and Studio Onewas recruited by Henry Fonda and Rose to direct. This is because this character is meant to act upon the mandates of his conscience and his idiosyncratic respect for human life as opposed to the rest of the jurors, whose votes are a direct consequence of their immediate backgrounds.
Lumet stated that his intention in using these techniques with cinematographer Boris Kaufman was to create a nearly palpable claustrophobia. A wisecracking, indecisive advertising executive. Moreover, he is the first juror to show humanity throughout the play.
Instead, he requests another vote, this time by secret ballot. Juror 8 tests how well Juror 4 remembers previous days, which he does, with difficulty. Eight's profession is that of an architect. Juror 8 concludes that, judging from what he claims to have heard earlier, the witness must have merely assumed it was the defendant running.
I betcha five thousand dollars I'd remember the movies I saw. He proposes that he will abstain from voting, and if the other 11 jurors are still unanimous in a guilty vote, then he will acquiesce to their decision.
However, the fact that the film version, which is also a classic, adds information about Juror Eight does not take away from the validity of the play's description. He is polite and makes a point of speaking with proper English grammar.
A man who grew up in a violent slum, and does not take kindly to insults about his upbringing. If there is any reasonable doubt of his guilt they are to return a verdict of not guilty. Having argued several points and gotten no favorable response from the others, Juror 8 reluctantly agrees that he has only succeeded in hanging the jury.
The film ends when the friendly Jurors 8 Mr. By the end of the film, nearly everyone is shown in closeup, using telephoto lenses from a lower angle, which decreases or "shortens" depth of field.
An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". Juror 8 cannily asks Juror 4 if he wears his eyeglasses to sleep, and Juror 4 admits that he does not wear them nobody does.
Therefore, Juror Number Eight, with the description given above, calls for a man of deep character and enormous depth of thought and humanity. Rather, someone that much shorter than his opponent would stab underhanded at an upwards angle. Juror 8 explains that being under emotional stress can make you forget certain things, and tests how well Juror 4 can remember the events of previous days.
Juror 3 gives a long and increasingly tortured string of arguments, ending with, "Rotten kids, you work your life out. Eight" corresponds to an amiable, analytical, and intelligent man who is actually the only one who gives the accused the benefit of the doubt. Juror 11, an immigrant who has repeatedly displayed strong patriotic pride, presses Juror 7 hard about using his vote frivolously, and eventually Juror 7 admits that he now truly believes the defendant is not guilty.
Juror 2 calls into question the prosecution's claim that the accused, who was 5'7" tall, was able to inflict the downward stab wound found on his father, who was 6'2". He is the sixth to vote "not guilty"; played by Edward Binns.
What's the difference how many seconds it was. Juror Number Seven is a brash salesman, Juror Number Eleven is a refugee from Europe who has suffered injustice, and then Juror Number Twelve works in advertisement and is a snob. If anything it helps to connect the missing dots that we may find in the script.
The stage synopsis describes the character of Juror 8: A rational, unflappable, self-assured and analytical stock broker who is concerned only with the facts, and is appalled by the bigotry of Juror His speech offends Juror 5, who turns his back to him, and one by one the rest of the jurors start turning away from him.
Juror 8 concludes that, judging from what he claims to have heard earlier, the witness must have merely assumed it was the defendant running. The jury retires to a private room, where the jurors spend a short while getting acquainted before they begin deliberating.
Instead, he requests another vote, this time by secret ballot.
He explains that there is too much at stake for him to go along with the verdict without at least talking about it first. Therefore, Juror Number Eight, with the description given above, calls for a man of deep character and enormous depth of thought and humanity.
A house painter, tough, but principled and respectful. It is immediately apparent that the jurors have already decided that the boy is guilty, and that they plan to return their verdict without taking time for discussion with the sole exception of Juror 8who is the only "not guilty" vote in a preliminary tally.
Bringing the big screen to life with description and analysis of Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) in 12 Angry Men. After it was brought in, Juror 8 quickly proved that it was impossible for the old man to get up, go into the hall, go down the hall to the front door, open it, and look out, all within 15 seconds, by reenacting the scene, while Juror 2 timed it.
Diary Juror 8 12 Angry Men. Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father.
The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. Get an answer for 'In Twelve Angry Men, how does the personality of Juror #6 affect his vote?' and find homework help for other Twelve Angry Men questions at eNotes.
In 12 Angry Men, Juror 8 is such a person, calmly and patiently leading his fellow jurors to a unanimous verdict of not guilty in what seems like an uphill battle. Let's look at how he. Transcript of 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 Juror 8 Biography Juror 8's name is Davis and his occupation is an architect.
It is obvious that he was very intelligent and has many years of experience in his job.Diary juror 8 12 angry men